request
GET /v2/invoices/inv_8f2200control
tenant boundary baseline403 ✓replay
IDOR / TENANT BOUNDARYresponse hash matched ×3stableRESPONSE360 / OFFENSIVE SECURITY
Find the paths that put your business at risk.
AI-assisted red teaming, from discovery to reproducible proof.
01 — FOLLOW THE ATTACK PATHIllustrative engagement
01 / ENTRY POINT
Public API
Authenticated session
Tenant B
02 / TRUST BOUNDARY
Ownership check
Object access granted
across tenant boundary
03 / BUSINESS IMPACT
Invoice exposure
Tenant A records returned
to Tenant B
Evidence attached Request · response · control · replayInspect the example ↗
01 / THE OUTPUT
Proof before priority.
FROM FINDING TO FIX
Understand the exposure.
Reproduce the finding.
Give engineering a clear next step.
Signal checked against a benign control
Stable replay attached to the finding
Engineering-ready remediation context
RESPONSE360 / FINDING R360-241-07VERIFIED
Cross-tenant object access
EvidenceRequest and response pair captured with sensitive values redacted.
ControlAn intentionally invalid session returned the expected access-denied response.
ReplayReproduced three times in the authorized test window. Confidence 0.94.
REQUESTRESPONSEREPLAY ×3FIX CONTEXT
02 / THE PROCESSFrom exposed surface
From exposed surface
to a clear next step.
One connected investigation.
Four deliberate stages.
Illustrative workflow · example dataScope → hypothesis → controlled test → evidence
03 / VALIDATION
Continuous testing.
Continuous testing.
Reproducible proof.
Every promising signal becomes a small investigation: exercise, benign control, replay. The graph below is what your team sees — the proven path, not the noise.
Proven attack pathtenant-b → tenant-a
Entry · authenticated
Session accepted as tenant B
valid session-b presented to api.acme.io
Weakness · root cause
Missing ownership check
GET /v2/invoices/:id returns any tenant’s object
Impact · data reached
Tenant A invoice records exposed
200 OK · body.tenant = tenant-a
Verdict · verified
Confirmed, not a false positive
benign control held · replay stable ×3
confidence 0.94Validation sequence
09:11:04map route discovered GET /v2/invoices/{id}
09:14:10probe session-b → tenant-a body returned
09:15:22candidate cross-tenant IDOR raised
09:17:31control benign request → 403 as expected
09:22:47replay stable ×3 · hash matched
09:23:05verified promoted · confidence 0.94
VERIFIED FINDING0.94
Cross-tenant IDOR on invoice retrieval — brief, evidence and reproduction steps ready for handoff.
Jira ticketSlack #securityJSON evidence
01
Reproduce
The exact request, response and context behind the finding.02
Prioritize
The affected boundary, exposed data and business impact.03
Remediate
A focused fix recommendation and a repeatable validation path.
[ Workflow Comparison ]
From a security signal
From a security signal
to a verified finding.
See how validation adds context to detection, from initial signal to engineering handoff.
Capability
Traditional scanner
RESPONSE360Autonomous red team
What lands in your queue
Raw alerts to triage
Verified findings only
False positives
Your problem to filter
Dismissed by controls & replay
Evidence with each finding
“Please reproduce this”
Request, response & replay attached
Authenticated & multi-tenant
Blind to session boundaries
Tests tenant & object ownership
After every deploy
Wait for the next scan window
New surface tested automatically
Engineering handoff
A ticket to investigate
A brief that’s ready to fix
04 / COVERAGE
Find risk across
Find risk across
Web, API, and Auth.
05 / FINDING BRIEFS
A finding your engineers
A finding your engineers
can reproduce.
Illustrative finding briefs that show the intended output: request, response, control, replay and clear reproduction steps.
asset
/.env.backuppubliccontrol
session omitted200proof
SECRET EXPOSUREsecret values redactedsealedEnvironment artifact reachable without a session on storage edge
R360-241-11CONF 0.88input
webhook_url → internal hostsentegress
metadata route observedhitreplay
SSRF / EGRESScallback correlation0.91Webhook URL validation bypass enabling internal metadata access
R360-238-03CONF 0.91
[ Pricing ]
Tell us your surface.
Tell us your surface.
We’ll scope the rest.
Every engagement is scoped to your surface, access model and release rhythm. Pricing starts with a short technical scoping session.
Recon
A first scoped assessment on one authorized domain to prove the workflow to your team.
- On-demand assessment
- Evidence-backed findings
- Exportable reports
- Surface change tracking
Continuous
Always-on engagements across your surfaces, tuned to how often you deploy.
- Scheduled engagements
- Authenticated testing
- Confidence scoring & replay
- Slack, Jira & webhook delivery
Enterprise
Governance, scale and resilience programs shaped around your security organisation.
- Distributed execution
- Resilience testing profiles
- SSO/SAML, governance, audit trail
- Dedicated onboarding
[ Governance & Control ]
Offensive testing,
Offensive testing,
under your control.
AI-assisted offensive testing only earns trust with explicit guardrails. Every engagement is scoped, measured and reviewable.
Scope-locked
Only assets you own or authorize in writing are ever touched — enforced, not promised.
Benign by default
Read-heavy validation and safe controls; disruptive profiles need explicit sign-off and limits.
Full audit trail
Every request, control and decision is logged and exportable for review and compliance.
SSO & RBAC
SAML/SSO with role boundaries so operators, viewers and auditors see exactly what they should.
Your data stays yours
Evidence is encrypted and isolated per tenant, retained on your terms and never resold.
[ FAQs ]
What teams ask
What teams ask
before the first run.
Does Response360 only test authorized targets?
Yes. Engagements are scope-locked and intended only for assets you own or have explicit written permission to test. Scope, guardrails and run history are recorded for auditability.
How is this different from a vulnerability scanner?
A traditional scanner usually stops at detection. Response360 adds a validation workflow around the signal: baselines, benign controls, replay, correlation, evidence and confidence scoring before a finding reaches your team.
Can it test authenticated and multi-tenant application flows?
Yes. Authorized authenticated surfaces can be included so session boundaries, IDOR-style access-control issues and business-logic paths can be evaluated with the right context.
Can we use it against production?
The platform is designed around scoped guardrails and measured testing. Read-heavy validation and benign controls can be used in production-friendly engagements; resilience/load profiles require explicit authorization and agreed limits.
What does engineering receive?
A concise finding brief with evidence, confidence, control/replay context and exportable details that can flow into supported collaboration and ticketing workflows.
How quickly can we start?
The first engagement can begin with one authorized surface and a clear scope. Timing depends on access requirements and is confirmed during technical scoping.